paladins
I have been following the recent paladin thread on Monte's BB and here are my thoughts:
I think a paladin should be LG, and I am willing to defend that pov, but if someone wants to open up the paladin class to all good alignments, or call their NG variant a "paladin" in his/her game, why should I (or anyone else) give two hoots about it?
Re: paladins
Ah. That one. Well, at least that one started out with a marginally new issue, but it morphed into the same ol' "should we allow chaos in paladinhood?" debate that they all default to at some point.
"Courage is the complement of fear. A fearless man cannot be courageous. He is also a fool." -- Robert Heinlein
Re: paladins
I believe a promiscuous, "love 'em and leave 'em" paladin should have to atone for his actions, but since the poster in question is not IMC, ultimately I don't care how he and his DM handle it.
There have been many.
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies